Identifying the Factors Influencing Personal Development in Flexible Work Environments
Keywords:
Personal development, flexible work environments, organizational learning, self-efficacy, time management, emotional intelligence, digital learningAbstract
This study aimed to identify the factors influencing personal development in flexible work environments. This qualitative study was conducted using an interpretative phenomenological approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 22 employees working in flexible work environments in Tehran. Participants were selected using purposive sampling, and data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis with NVivo software. The results indicated that personal development in flexible work environments is influenced by three main factors: organizational factors, individual factors, and characteristics of flexible work environments. Organizational factors included managerial support, organizational learning opportunities, and a development-oriented culture. On an individual level, self-efficacy, time management, emotional intelligence, and creativity were identified as key factors facilitating personal development. Furthermore, workplace characteristics such as autonomy in career planning, supportive networks, and digital learning tools contributed to personal growth. However, reduced direct interactions and the necessity for high self-motivation emerged as challenges within these environments. Flexible work environments can provide opportunities for personal development, but their effectiveness depends on organizational support, a learning-oriented culture, access to educational resources, and employees' self-management skills. The findings of this study can assist organizations in designing policies that enhance personal development in flexible work settings.
Downloads
References
Abdoolla, A., & Govender, P. (2016). Risk Connected to the Demographic Factors in Managing LabourRelationsin the Tertiary Sector of the Economy. Risk Governance and Control Financial Markets &Institutions, 6(4), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.22495/rcgv6i4c3art7
Baihushev, V., & Holovkova, L. S. (2020). Formalization of an Integrated Approach to the Formation andManagement of Flexible Associations of Corporate Structures. Economic Analysis(30(1, Part 2)), 7-17.https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.01.02.007
Benadé, L. (2017). The Impacts on Teachers’ Work: Working in Flexible Learning Environments. 107-133.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3782-5_5
Cabaraban, L. A., & Borbon, N. M. D. (2021). Work Life Balance Among Hotel Employees in Cagayan De OroCityDuring COVID-19 Pandemic, Misamis Oriental. International Journal of Research Studies inManagement, 9(4).https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2021.m7738
Enbuske, A. S. (2019). Digitalisation, Work Environment and Personal Integrity at Work. Transfer EuropeanReviewof Labour and Research, 25(2), 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258919851928
Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Butler, B. S., Savage, S., Lutz, C., Dunn, M., & Sawyer, S. (2021). Flexible WorkandPersonal Digital Infrastructures. Communications of the Acm, 64(7), 72-79.https://doi.org/10.1145/3419405
Kim, M., Kim, E., & Choi, S. (2016). Nurses' Perception of Flexible Working and Its Operational Guideline.Journalof the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(1), 664-675.https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.1.664
Mele, V. (2019). Work and Personality in Flexible Capitalism. Max Weber Studies, 19(1), 64-87.https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2019.0010
Piszczek, M., Martin, J. E., Pimputkar, A., & Laulié, L. (2021). What Does Schedule Fit Add to Work–familyResearch? The Incremental Effect of Schedule Fit on Work–family Conflict, Schedule Satisfaction,andTurnover Intentions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(4), 866-889.https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12367
Putri, T. F., & Sugiarti, Y. (2020). Work-Life Balance Konsultan Pajak Di Kantor Konsultan “X” DiSurabaya.Akuntansi Dan Teknologi Informasi, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.24123/jati.v13i1.2837
Ran, Y. (2016). Research on Teleworking of Urban DisabledPersons.https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh16.2016.144
Rubtsova, N. N., & Rudenko, E. A. (2021). Interaction Between University Teachers andEducationalOrganizationsas a Factor in the Formation of Flexible Skills of a Future Teacher. VolgaRegion Pedagogical Search, 4(38),35-42. https://doi.org/10.33065/2307-1052-2021-4-38-35-42
Samani, S. A., Rasid, S. Z. A., & Sofian, S. (2015). Perceived Level of Personal Control Over theWorkEnvironmentand Employee Satisfaction and Work Performance. Performance Improvement, 54(9),28-35.https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21499
Voronin, V., Zhdanova, M., Khamidullin, I., Semenishchev, E. A., Zelensky, A., & Ilyukhin, Y. (2022).ActionRecognition Algorithm From Visual Sensor Data for Contactless Robot ControlSystems.https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2642003
Weale, V., Wells, Y., & Oakman, J. (2017). Flexible Working Arrangements in Residential Aged Care: ApplyingaPerson–environment Fit Model. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(3), 356-374.https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12142
Yang, D., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The Effect of Family Boundary Flexibility on Employees’ WorkEngagement: A Study Based on Person-Environment Fit Theory Perspective. Frontiers in psychology,14.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185239
Zapata-Cantú, L., Ibarra, G., & Blancher, P.-H. (2023). Engaging New Ways of Work: The relevance ofFlexibilityand Digital Tools in a Post-Covid-19 Era. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People andPerformance,11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-04-2022-0079
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.